Keras vs Torch implementation. Same results for SGD, different results for Adam

I have been trying to replicate a model I build in tensorflow/keras in Pytorch. I saw that the performance worsened a lot after training the model in my Pytorch implementation. So I tried replicating a simpler model and figured out that the problem depends on the optimizer I used, since I get different results when using Adam (and some of the other optimizers I have tried) but the same for SGD. Can someone help me out with fixing this?

Underneath the code showing that the results are the same for SGD (except for rounding errors) and differing for Adam:

import torch
from torch import nn
from torch.nn import Dropout, SiLU, Linear
import torch.optim as optim
import numpy as np

import tensorflow as tf
from tensorflow import keras
from tensorflow.keras import regularizers

class NN_torch(nn.Module):
def init(self, input_dim, output_dim, nodes):
self.dense_0 = Linear(input_dim, nodes)
self.swish_0 = SiLU()
self.out = Linear(nodes, output_dim)

def forward(self, x):
    out = self.dense_0(x)
    out = self.swish_0(out)
    out = self.out(out)
    return out

def init_keras_model(nodes, optimizer):
model = keras.Sequential()
model.add(keras.layers.Dense(1, activation=“linear”))
return model

def compare_keras_torch(Adam=True, lr = 0.01):
# Set seeds and initialize data
x_sample = np.array(np.random.uniform(size=[10, 10]), dtype=np.float)
y_sample = np.array(np.random.uniform(size=[10, 1]), dtype=np.float)

# Initialize models 
model_torch = NN_torch(x_sample.shape[1], 1, 10)

if Adam:
    optimizer_keras = keras.optimizers.Adam(lr)
    optimizer_torch = optim.Adam(model_torch.parameters(), lr=lr)
    optimizer_keras = keras.optimizers.SGD(lr)
    optimizer_torch = optim.SGD(model_torch.parameters(), lr=lr)

model_keras = init_keras_model(x_sample.shape[0], optimizer_keras)[None, x_sample.shape[1]])

# Set same weights
weight_0 = np.transpose(model_torch.dense_0.weight.detach().numpy())
bias_0 = np.transpose(model_torch.dense_0.bias.detach().numpy())
model_keras.get_layer(index=0).set_weights([weight_0, bias_0])
weight_1 = np.transpose(model_torch.out.weight.detach().numpy())
bias_1 = np.transpose(model_torch.out.bias.detach().numpy())
model_keras.get_layer(index=2).set_weights([weight_1, bias_1])

# Confirm models create same output
keras_pred = model_keras.predict(x_sample)
torch_pred = model_torch(torch.tensor(x_sample).float())
print((keras_pred - torch_pred.detach().numpy()))

# One epoch with same data, y_sample, batch_size=x_sample.shape[0], shuffle=False, epochs=1)

criterion = nn.MSELoss()
outputs = model_torch(torch.tensor(x_sample).float())
loss = criterion(outputs, torch.tensor(y_sample.reshape(-1, 1)).float())

# Confirm models create same output
keras_pred = model_keras.predict(x_sample)
torch_pred = model_torch(torch.tensor(x_sample).float())
print((keras_pred - torch_pred.detach().numpy()))

compare_keras_torch(Adam=True, lr = 0.1)
compare_keras_torch(Adam=False, lr = 0.1)

Hi Bvmcheckking, I got the same issue. Have you figured out what is causing this? If so, would you mind sharing with me your insight?

Hey Mandyxie,

Unfortunately I have not been able to figure it out.

Can you share a plot of how the convergence differs between Frameworks?

The implementation of Adam is actually different between PyTorch and TensorFlow so seeing a small difference in results is expected in the final stages of convergence.

Hi Bvmcheckking,

Thank you for your response!

I would like to add that I am having a similar issue but with SGD with momentum. Same model with same initialization uses a 0.1 learning rate using pytorch SGD but with that learning rate the tensorflow version saturates. So it seems there are more things different.

I shall say that I am using a similar initialization (for my use case Resnet I am using kaiming uniform) and although it is known that weight decay is not applied in the same way in both frameworks I shall say that if I remove the weight decay i.e. wd=0, the saturation problem persists.