Ok thanks, i understand. I changed my code around a bit and now the initial input token is the last value of the known input data, should be a bit better then zero.

Hi, all

I was using this post as a guide to do the exact same thing (I think). I was just confused about the batches.

I have a large panel dataset of approximately 670 features along over 1800 days. My idea was to build a model that encodes sequences of these features (of length 45) and decodes another series, with length 7.

Is something as follows: I take X.iloc[n:n+45, :] (subsets of all features for 45 periods, for n=0, 1, …) and y[n+45:n+45+7] (a sequence of length 7 that starts just after the features end).

So a training pair for my model should be (X.iloc[n:n+45, :], y[n+45:n+45+7]) for some n.

I understood that in the example shown I should input these as batches (if n=0, 1, …, N I would have N+1 batches) and train with all the training sets every at every iteration, I am correct?

Because I have seen examples applied to NLP, and there are no batches (as in https://pytorch.org/tutorials/intermediate/seq2seq_translation_tutorial.html). Instead every iteration of the training is done with a different training pair.

What is the difference between this two approaches? Did I get it right? Thanks for the help.

Hi, I am also trying to do the same thing. So in the end, did you lag your features by 6 hours?

For Chris’s example implementation, first 10 hour features input is matched and being trained to the future 6 hours output. Thanks for the help!

Hi, I’m using pretty much the exact same code, but I’m interested in the output values as well, so I’ve extracted the evaluation process into the train() method.

```
class Encoder(nn.Module):
def __init__(self, input_size, hidden_dim, num_layers=1):
super(Encoder, self).__init__()
print('Initializing Encoder...')
self.input_size = input_size
self.hidden_dim = hidden_dim
self.num_layers = num_layers
# self.lstm = nn.LSTM(self.input_size, self.hidden_dim, num_layers=self.num_layers, batch_first=True)
self.lstm = nn.LSTM(input_size=input_size,
hidden_size=self.hidden_dim,
num_layers=self.num_layers,
batch_first=True) # Note that "batch_first" is set to "True"
self.hidden = None
def init_hidden(self, batch_size):
return (torch.zeros(self.num_layers, batch_size, self.hidden_dim).to(device),
torch.zeros(self.num_layers, batch_size, self.hidden_dim).to(device))
def forward(self, inputs):
# Push through RNN layer (the ouput is irrelevant)
_, self.hidden = self.lstm(inputs, self.hidden)
return self.hidden
class Decoder(nn.Module):
def __init__(self, hidden_dim, num_layers=1):
super(Decoder, self).__init__()
print('Initializing Decoder...')
# input_size=1 since the output are single values
self.lstm = nn.LSTM(1, hidden_dim, num_layers=num_layers, batch_first=True)
self.out = nn.Linear(hidden_dim, 1)
def forward(self,decoder_input, outputs, hidden):
batch_size, num_steps = outputs.shape
input = decoder_input.view(batch_size,1)
# Convert (batch_size, output_size) to (seq_len, batch_size, output_size)
# In case of batch first
input = input.unsqueeze(2)
# loss = 0
x = []
for i in range(num_steps):
# Push current input through LSTM: (seq_len=1, batch_size, input_size=1)
output, hidden = self.lstm(input, hidden)
# Push the output of last step through linear layer; returns (batch_size, 1)
# output = self.out(output[-1])
# In case of batch first
output = self.out(output[:, -1, :])
# Generate input for next step by adding seq_len dimension (see above)
input = output.unsqueeze(2)
# Compute loss between predicted value and true value
# loss += criterion(output.squeeze(0), outputs[:, i])
x.append(output)
return torch.cat(x, dim=1)
```

I also have some previous values, so that I don’t initialize the Decoder with 0, but instead with previous values of the value that i want to predict.

Now i have a problem and a question:

First my problem: My output at some point is only NaNs, as well as the weights of my output layer in the Decoder. What would be possible reasons for that?

My first instinct would be to look at the activation function, but I’m not sure, how i should add an activation function in this case.

Hi Chris,

Good day.

I am also trying on the multi step forecasting.

I tried your posted example here.

But I got an error as follow:

/usr/local/lib/python3.7/dist-packages/torch/nn/modules/loss.py:528: UserWarning: Using a target size (torch.Size([2])) that is different to the input size (torch.Size([2, 1])). This will likely lead to incorrect results due to broadcasting. Please ensure they have the same size.

return F.mse_loss(input, target, reduction=self.reduction)

May I know how to solve this problem?

Thanks