Hello,
I am trying to do set-matching. meaning given set_a and set_b a model M can generate a similarity score between these sets. M(set_a, set_b) = alpha and alpha is positive float. I wanted to start with this baseline. The gradients are all in magnitude of 1.e-6 so there’s no learning, and the code is pretty ugly (for loops) and I think that might be the reason behind this gradients.

``````class MyMatcher(nn.Module):
def __init__(self, node_features):
super(MyMatcher, self).__init__()
self.device = torch.device(
'cuda' if torch.cuda.is_available() else 'cpu')
self.node_encoder = nn.Sequential(nn.Linear(node_features, 128), nn.ReLU(), nn.Linear(128, 128), nn.ReLU(), nn.Linear(128, 128), nn.ReLU())
self.self_attention = nn.Sequential(nn.Linear(128*2, 128), nn.Tanh(), nn.Linear(128, 1))

def cosine_sim(self, a, b):
a_norm = a / a.norm(dim=1)[:, None]
b_norm = b / b.norm(dim=1)[:, None]
def similarity(self, set_a, set_b):
sim = self.cosine_sim(set_a, set_b)
rows, columns = linear_sum_assignment(1 - sim.cpu().detach().numpy())
selected_b = set_b[columns]
selected_a = set_a[rows]
input_attention = torch.hstack([self.node_encoder(selected_a), self.node_encoder(selected_b)])
output_attention = F.softmax(self.self_attention(input_attention), dim=0)
def forward(self, x, y, num_candidates):
scores = torch.empty((x.shape[0],num_candidates - 1), dtype=torch.float32).to(self.device)
for batch in range(len(x)):
scores[batch] = self.forward_single_batch(x[batch:batch+1], y[batch:batch+1])
return scores
def forward_single_batch(self, x, y):
assert x.shape[0] == 1
x, y = x[y!=-1], y[y!=-1] # remove batch indice, remove padded data
x_anchor = x[y==0]
anchor_len = len(x_anchor)
scores = torch.empty((1,len(torch.unique(y[y!=0]))), dtype=torch.float32).to(self.device)
sorted_y, _ = torch.sort(torch.unique(y[y!=0]))
for idx, yn in enumerate(sorted_y):
temp_xn  = x[y==yn]
if len(temp_xn) < anchor_len:
scores[0, idx] = self.similarity(set_a =temp_xn , set_b = x_anchor)
else:
scores[0, idx] = self.similarity(set_a = x_anchor, set_b = temp_xn)
return scores
``````

The inputs (x, y, num_candidates):

x: is the shape of (batch_size, N, set_element_feature_size). a single batch contains 7 sets, and every set might have a different number of elements in it. so for example, batch1 might have 230 elements, batch2 118 elements… to be able to collate the batches, I bad with 0 smaller batches. and end up in this case with (2, 230, set_element_feature_size).

y: is the shape (batch_size, N) is an indexer for x. every value of y tells us to which set a given row in x belongs. so since we have 7 sets the values of y are in {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, -1} the -1 here represents the row that we padded in x during the collate function.

My question is:

• from a gradient point of view and not from “pretty not pretty code” point of view. Do you see any problem that might cause gradients to be small.
• Do you see a way to vectorise this ?
• The gradients are not good in the last layer and then they vanish when we go deeper. the gradients are all in the magnitude of 1e-6, 1.e-8, 1.e-9 and some are 0.

Thank you

Hello ilyes!

…could you try the ResNet approach for your `node_encoder` below?